Good US growth statistics are often artificial

How do these statistics compare to US statistics?

The economy has grown by 3.1 percent over the previous year. It is very different with Europe. In the last three months of last year, there was a growth of 3.3 percent, compared to zero growth. That big difference has to do with US reporting, which they call the 'annual count' over there. Had it been reported the European way, there would have been 0.8 percent growth.

Article continues below the video.

How do you explain that difference?

We are used to seeing percentage growth in these types of things. But if we look at the absolute figures per conversion, we see something. Because the US economy expanded by $329 billion in the last three months of last year. But if you look at the budget deficit in the last quarter of last year, the federal government was $510 billion. If the government is red, it will spend that money too. If you take these two figures together, you can say that without those huge budget deficits, the US economy would have had an incredibly difficult time growing. So you could say that the better performance of the US economy is mostly artificial because it is mostly due to rising debts. Compared to the first half of last year, national debt has actually decreased in the euro countries, while national debt in the US has been increasing.

Also Read | The Dutch are top earners in international trade, but protectionism threatens prosperity

What does this say about the US economy?

If you had $329 billion in economic growth last quarter, but you're also dealing with a $510 billion budget deficit, that means you need more than a dollar of debt for every dollar of economic growth. Seen this way, America's growth rate is more to cry about than to be happy about.

Also Read | Banks keep their fingers crossed: 'Prospects are getting worse'

But growth is just growth, right?

If your growth depends only on the growing large budget deficit in the country, it does not seem like desirable growth to me. Desired growth occurs when more people work and the productivity of those people increases. In fact, you would be happier with 1 percent growth from those sources than 3 percent growth because the government is spending a lot of money. That money accumulates in the form of loans, which means interest costs go up. This way you really only bring growth from the future, but that's it.

Also Read | 'It is logical that unions lose confidence in the ECB due to Nat's comments'